much reflection

autumn days pull 
much reflection - 
a flight of swallows. 

[Oct 21, 2013 - shortly after this haiku was written, i received a call to inform me that my good friend, teacher and mentor, peter roosen-runge had died. so much more to reflect on now]


in canada day...


unlock and keep or lock and lose

today, rogers decided to decline my request to unlock an iphone I have in my account. Their reason: their "policy" states that IMEI number should be associated with an account for 90 days. But that is a laughable comic book policy that has nothing whatsoever to do with the service you are already paying for that phone. When you bought your used phone, did you remember to register its IMEI number with your carrier? Wait, your carrier already knows all about that phone, doesn't it. So what does this "policy" really mean?

Here are the relevant passages from the recent CRTC decision.

"164. The Commission therefore considers that WSPs should make an unlocking service available to customers who have been subscribed to their services for 90 days, at a rate specified in the contract and Critical Information Summary.

165. The Commission also considers that unsubsidized devices, which are fully paid for, should be unlocked immediately upon request, given that the risk of subscription fraud is not relevant in these circumstances." 

What part of these passages rogers failed to comprehend?

I told the apologetic customer retention specialist that this will cost rogers. I know he understood. I doubt rogers does.

[update: after I escalated the issue to the management, with the intention to write letter to the office of the president, and CRTC, unlock request was granted. the damage is done: the phone flew overseas without unlock.]


on practice

practice can make
the wrong thing
you practiced


adobe and its hostages

i will get straight to the point. like ibm and oracle before it, adobe would like to have hostages, not customers. it has done everything it possibly can to lock the world to its costly [in multiple meanings of the term] products. now comes the next logical step: take the products to the "cloud" and charge continuously.

you weren't surprised, were you?

create suction.

what is about to happen to photoshop et al. should encourage us to review our image processing dependencies. what is in the image processing pipeline, and what if one of the components become unaffordable, perhaps in price, performance or compatibility? for most photographers [and comic book artists] photoshop comes close to a lock-in. on the other hand, it is big, heavy and sluggish; workflow tools have all but destroyed that lock. there is no reason to let an acr upgrade for a new camera to determine the costly upgrade path to another version of photoshop, or possibly a new license fee in the cloud [just where do you think adobe will stop?] but what about that workflow? are you able to deal with your images, and produce professional results without lightroom?

I can. started my photo workflow with aperture, not lightroom. I now use four different workflow tools. capture one pro happens to be the tether and raw favorite, even if lightroom catalogues have most of my images. I have also been spending some time with darktable. I suggest you do the same: explore other workflow tools.

As john paul caponigro says, stay loose, stay flexible. I will add: avoid getting locked in, sucked up.

here is my new logo for the next best image processing tool. [it was crafted using gimp, of course]